Posisyon ng INC ating pulsuhan

Paghihiwalay ng Simbahan at Estado.

Kamakailan po ay nag labas ng posisyon ang INC sa pamamagitan ng kanilang tagapagsalita na si Ka Edwil Zabala, ayon po sa nasabing broadcast ang nais ng INC ay ipatupad ang ating batas. Pairalin ang Rule of Law.

Sa ating jurisdiction may umiiral po na tinatawag na separasyon ng simbahan at gobyerno. Sa Ingles Separation of Church and State. Ito po ay nag-a-atas na huwag makikialam sa mga pamamalakad ang dalawang organisasyong ito sa mga pang loob nilang pamamalakad o internal affairs.

Sa isyung ito masasabi nating di poi to isang paglabag sa nasabing prinsipyo. Sapagkat ang paghiling na ipatupad ang buong batas sa ating bayan ay natural po lamang at siyang nararapat. Tulad ng nasabi nabangit na tagapagsalita kailangan nating pairalin ang Rule of Law upang maatim natin ang katiwasayan at kapayapaan na kinakailangan ng isang Estado.

Sa punto pong ito atin pong pinupuri ang ginawang deklarasyon ng INC.

Pugante nga po ba si Senador dela Rosa?

Para naman po ating matalaky ang isyung ito kailangan nating kumunsulta sa website ng Korte Suprema. Ito po ang kanilang deklarasyon:

“An accused is generally considered a fugitive from justice when they fail to appear physically before the court when required by law, the rules, or an order from the judge.” ( https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-clarifies-rules-on-fugitive-status-bars-them-from-judicial-relief/#:~:text=An%20accused%20is%20generally%20considered,an%20order%20from%20the%20judge.)

Natural lamang po ang ang mga binabangit na batas o law, tuntunin o patakaran o rules, at utos o order from the judge ay tumutukoy sa LOKAL na batas, tuntunin at utos sa ating bayan PILIPINAS. Samantalang ang artikulong ito ang atin pong sinusulat ay wala po tayong nalalamang batas, alituntunin o patakaran mas lalong wala po tayong nababalitang order ng isang lokal na huwes na nalabag ni Senador dela Rosa. Kung kaya’t ating pong buod matapos nating ikonsidera ang lahat ng mga nababangit ay hindi poi sang pugante si Senador dela Rosa. Maidagdag po natin na ang sabihing siya ay isang pugante ay maaring pagtaliwas sa ating mga umiiral na batas (defamation or libel) depende sa mga circumstances na umiiral sa akto ng ito ay isagawa.

Awtomatikong pag papasatupad ng foreign warrant

Ang madalas pong pagbasihan ng mga nagnanais na ito ay ipatupad ay ang Republic Act 9851 section 17 pati na rin Article 59 ng Rome Statute. Ano po ba ang nilalaman ng mga nasabing batas:

R.A. 9851, enacted Dec. 11, 2009
Philippine Act on Crimes Against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes Against Humanity

Section 17: (2nd paragraph)
In the interest of justice, the relevant Philippine authorities may dispense with the investigation or prosecution of a crime punishable under this Act if another court or international tribunal is already conducting the investigation or undertaking the prosecution of such crime. Instead, the authorities may surrender or extradite suspected or accused persons in the Philippines to the appropriate international court, if any, or to another State pursuant to the applicable extradition laws and treaties.

Rome Statute Foundational International Treaty that established the (ICC) International Criminal Court

Article 59: Arrest proceedings in the custodial State
1. A State Party which has received a request for provisional arrest or for arrest and surrender shall immediately take steps to arrest the person in question in accordance with its laws and the provisions of Part 9.
2. A person arrested shall be brought promptly before the competent judicial authority in the custodial State which shall determine, in accordance with the law of that State, that:
(a) (b) (c) The warrant applies to that person;
The person has been arrested in accordance with the proper process; and The person’s rights have been respected.
3. 4. 5. 6. The person arrested shall have the right to apply to the competent authority in the custodial State for interim release pending surrender.
In reaching a decision on any such application, the competent authority in the custodial State shall consider whether, given the gravity of the alleged crimes, there are urgent and exceptional circumstances to justify interim release and whether necessary safeguards exist to ensure that the custodial State can fulfil its duty to surrender the person to the Court. It shall not be open to the competent authority of the custodial State to consider whether the warrant of arrest was properly issued in accordance with article 58, paragraph 1 (a) and (b).
The Pre-Trial Chamber shall be notified of any request for interim release and shall make recommendations to the competent authority in the custodial State. The competent authority in the custodial State shall give full consideration to such recommendations, including any recommendations on measures to prevent the escape of the person, before renderin.

***

Bukas ang espasyong ito para sa inyong panig, paglilinaw, o tugon. Para sa anumang sumbong o lokal na problema, mag-email lamang sa: arnelpetil12@gmail.com o bisitahin ang aking YouTube Channel: MisyonAksyonArnelDadorPetil. Maaari ninyo akong tawagan sa CP: 09949693361.